🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
附上術前及術後六個月的電腦斷層比較 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-828E1761850B
附上術前及術後六個月的電腦斷層比較，這原本是一個手術優先(加上術後牙齒矯正)的案例。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術前術後六個月電腦斷層比較，手術優先加術後矯正案例
DNT-6DA41362D4B8
但手術後，她對於咬合的改變覺得非常適應，並未接受術後的牙齒矯正治療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 該claim關於患者術後適應咬合及未接受正畸的陳述
DNT-7ADA616BF460
but after surgery she felt very well adapted to the changes in occlusion and did not undergo orthodontic treatment afterward. 手術前後外觀照比對 手術成效因人而異，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 該claim關於患者術後適應、未接受正畸及外觀對比的內容
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform