🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-0054A39A0E84
附上術前及術後六個月的電腦斷層比較，這原本是一個手術優先(加上術後牙齒矯正)的案例。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術前及術後六個月的電腦斷層比較、手術優先、術後牙齒矯正等具體案例資訊，均未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-9661CB503C1C
但手術後，她對於咬合的改變覺得非常適應，並未接受術後的牙齒矯正治療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 手術後對咬合改變的適應程度、未接受術後牙齒矯正治療等個人結果，evidence 均未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform