🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
診斷： 門牙假牙套密合度不佳，造成續發性蛀牙 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-6796C1517D31
診斷： 門牙假牙套密合度不佳，造成續發性蛀牙，且牙套外形及材質不良，刺激牙齦紅腫發炎。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 診斷性宣稱：假牙套密合度不佳、續發性蛀牙、外形材質不良刺激牙齦紅腫發炎，均未被證據支持。
DNT-6CF7444BA51E
治療計劃： 先拆除舊門牙牙套，去除軟化齒質後，右上門牙裝上強化陶瓷釘柱，再依據口內鄰牙顏色，更換兩顆門牙全瓷假牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 治療計劃細節：拆除舊牙套、去除軟化齒質、安裝陶瓷釘柱、依鄰牙顏色更換全瓷假牙，均未被證據提及。
DNT-5A18411418AD
將蛀牙清除後，尚可保留牙根重新製作牙冠;重新製作強化釘柱，增加齒內強度。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 蛀牙清除後保留牙根、重新製作牙冠、強化釘柱增加齒內強度等程序均未被證據提及；證據僅討論特定鈦合金牙冠材料之生物相容性與抗菌性。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform