🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
3
Partly supported
7
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (10 statements)
DNT-BF9F744ECEAA
牙齦組織會隨骨頭萎縮而塌陷，造成後續植牙時補骨需求增加。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句未獲支持：未提及牙齦組織隨骨頭萎縮而塌陷的機制，也未建立此機制與後續補骨需求增加的因果關係。
DNT-49635A42386F
骨質高度嚴重流失後，手術難度會從一般植牙提升至深層補骨。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence 支持骨質品質或骨量不足時，植牙治療常需要骨再生/補骨以提升成功率。
DNT-C53928EFCD98
針對多顆缺牙或骨質極差者，牙橋或活動假牙也是可行的選項。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 多顆缺牙或骨質極差者選擇牙橋或活動假牙為可行選項。
DNT-D0FE331D9081
若骨質豐沛且鄰牙健康，單顆植牙是保護鄰牙的最佳方案。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 完整宣稱：骨質豐沛且鄰牙健康時，單顆植牙是保護鄰牙的最佳方案。
DNT-A7DE0B4D9511
若鄰牙已有大面積齲齒，選用牙橋修復可同時解決多項問題。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 大面積齲齒破壞的牙齒可透過直接或間接贋復程序恢復。
DNT-92EE4DE13849
骨質嚴重不足且不願接受補骨者，可考慮支撐力良好的活動義齒。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 骨質嚴重不足且不願補骨者使用活動義齒的建議、活動義齒支撐力，均未見於證據。
DNT-5EC98607A491
牙橋平均約 10 年需更換，且需注意橋體下方細菌滲入導致鄰牙蛀蝕。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋平均約10年需更換、橋體下方細菌滲入導致鄰牙蛀蝕的命題。
DNT-EAE7CB01AAB1
醫師評估通常看這些重點 最佳處理時機通常是在拔牙後傷口癒合後的 2 至 4 個月內。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 僅提及拔牙後3個月的癒合評估，未提及「2至4個月」為最佳處理時機。
DNT-0997C253EC5E
缺牙 1 年內骨質流失較少，多數可直接進行微創植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 缺牙一年內骨質流失較少、多數可直接進行微創植牙等完整宣稱。
DNT-DE42DA3F4E16
牙周病控制必須排在首位，避免細菌隨血液進入植牙傷口。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『牙周病控制必須排在首位』及『避免細菌隨血液進入植牙傷口』的因果建議，證據未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform