🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
8
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)
DNT-C138C1563742
減少口腔摩擦：隱形牙套與新型自鎖矯正器的選擇 過去許多人害怕矯正，是因為金屬矯正器容易刮破口腔黏膜，造成破皮流血。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句未獲支持：金屬矯正器刮破口腔黏膜、破皮流血、新型自鎖矯正器及減少口腔摩擦等均無對應證據。
DNT-09C26BC4DB77
現在除了隱形牙套外，新型自鎖式矯正器體積更小、邊緣更圓滑，大幅減少與口腔內側的摩擦。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 新型自鎖式矯正器體積更小、邊緣更圓滑、大幅減少口腔內側摩擦等宣稱皆未出現
DNT-1B065259B578
選擇合適的矯正工具，能有效避免傳統牙套常見的口腔破皮問題。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 選擇合適矯正工具可避免傳統牙套口腔破皮
DNT-91FE4D5E68A7
拔牙與不拔牙矯正的決策指標 許多患者一聽到拔牙就感到抗拒，但在暴牙矯正中，拔牙往往是為了創造牙齒安全後退的空間。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 拔牙與不拔牙矯正決策指標、患者對拔牙的抗拒、暴牙矯正拔牙是創造牙齒安全後退空間
DNT-2CB3C4EE294D
是否拔牙，取決於是否需要足夠空間讓牙齒向後移動，而不是單純為了整齊排列。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 是否拔牙取決於後退空間需求而非整齊排列的矯正決策原則
DNT-624FE284B6F1
過度節食可能導致臉頰凹陷，形成俗稱的「牙套臉」。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 過度節食、臉頰凹陷、『牙套臉』的成因與定義
DNT-AA1EACDD13A4
維持良好的飲食與清潔習慣，是避免牙套臉與蛀牙的關鍵。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 良好的飲食與清潔習慣、牙套臉、避免蛀牙的因果關鍵均未在 abstract 中出現或直接斷言。
DNT-EEDFDB65CA1F
維持器的終身守護：別讓好不容易後退的暴牙打回原形 許多人誤以為拆掉牙套就代表療程結束， 事實上真正穩定成果的關鍵在於維持器 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 拆牙套不等於療程結束、維持器才是穩定成果關鍵的整句命題。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform