🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
耗時2年治療，再次植牙做假牙，現在 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)
DNT-508ED59118B3
耗時2年治療，再次植牙做假牙，現在，徐女士認真執行口腔清潔，再也不敢不規律回診了。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 耗時2年治療，再次植牙做假牙，徐女士認真執行口腔清潔，規律回診
DNT-8F82A240076B
」 植牙、假牙都是以人工治療的方式取代缺牙，需看患者自身條件、考量牙齒費用及治療時間來決定，沒有一勞永逸的方式，但無論選擇何種治療，都不能輕忽之後的口腔保健。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 選擇治療方式需考慮患者自身條件（偏好、健康、缺牙程度、定期追蹤、吸菸狀況、口腔健康）
DNT-728D82B3AE9D
許多民眾以為植牙可以一勞永逸，「文獻統計，植牙成功率約95-98%，但真正成功與否，取決於術後照顧。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-D3500A4F71AC
宋旻怡建議，植牙雖然不會蛀牙，但仍有牙齦發炎、齒槽骨吸收牙根搖動斷裂等牙周病症狀。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙不會蛀牙以及宋旻怡的個人建議未經證據證實
DNT-DD79A02CEDCD
植牙成功率高 術後照顧更關鍵 「糖尿病患者雖可在仔細評估後植牙，但血糖一旦控制不佳，會促進牙周組織發炎反應，使牙周病感染情形惡化，進而影響植牙牙根穩定性。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 血糖控制不佳會促進植體周圍發炎及骨質流失，影響牙根穩定性
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform