🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
此條款認定基準為：實際 共同 居住 — sentence-by-sentence verification
4
Self-claimed, unverified
0
Third-party corroborated
0
Verifiable in government registry
0
Conflicts with public registry
What this page measures: Each sentence is tagged by how it can be checked: verifiable verbatim in government open data / corroborated by a third party / self-claimed and unverified (the organisation's own words — we do not endorse them) / conflicting with the public registry. This line has no clinical literature to check against, so no literature-support claim is made. The analysed text comes fromsource page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
HRA-82824360-0184
X 2.已申請家庭看護工(外 技 家庭看護工)者。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-82824360-0185
X 3.已申請家庭幫傭者。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-82824360-0186
⚠️ 備註：每一家庭成員僅得就該條件 擇一 適用。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-82824360-0187
此條款認定基準為：實際 共同 居住，且平均每月工作收入未超過當年最低基本工資。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this entity's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform