🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
當時有意願參加者共270家 — sentence-by-sentence verification
2
Self-claimed, unverified
0
Third-party corroborated
0
Verifiable in government registry
0
Conflicts with public registry
What this page measures: Each sentence is tagged by how it can be checked: verifiable verbatim in government open data / corroborated by a third party / self-claimed and unverified (the organisation's own words — we do not endorse them) / conflicting with the public registry. This line has no clinical literature to check against, so no literature-support claim is made. The analysed text comes fromsource page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
HRA-70390945-0010
當時有意願參加者共270家,勞委會隨機抽選50家,評鑑結果分為五級,總成績A級最佳,E級最差,只有十三家願意被公布成績,一申 公司全面被評鑑為A級,勞委會更於九十三年度要求所有仲介者均要接受正式評鑑,總成績A級有八十六家,其中每項評鑑指標皆A級的只有十四家,一申公司亦全面被評鑑為A級,再次受到勞委會肯定!
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
HRA-70390945-0011
回列表頁 申請外勞專線:0800-616-866 電話:02-8985-1000 傳真:02-8985-0088 地址:新北市新莊區新北大道三段7號18樓之6 E-mail: service@ishen.com.tw Copyright © 2013 一申國際 All rights reserved. Web Design by OZCHAMP
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this entity's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform