🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
為發展完善的長照制度，行政院於2007年核定《長… — sentence-by-sentence verification
3
Self-claimed, unverified
0
Third-party corroborated
0
Verifiable in government registry
0
Conflicts with public registry
What this page measures: Each sentence is tagged by how it can be checked: verifiable verbatim in government open data / corroborated by a third party / self-claimed and unverified (the organisation's own words — we do not endorse them) / conflicting with the public registry. This line has no clinical literature to check against, so no literature-support claim is made. The analysed text comes fromsource page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
HRA-24587683-0014
為發展完善的長照制度，行政院於2007年核定《長照十年計畫》（簡稱長照1.0），積極推動長照業務。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-24587683-0015
隨著人口老化與照顧服務需求多元化，為因應失能、失智人口增加所衍生之長照需求，行政院於2016年12月核定《長照十年計畫2.0》（簡稱長照2.0），提供從支持家庭、居家、社區到住宿式照顧之多元連續服務，建立以社區為基礎之長照服務體系，並自2017年1月起實施長照2.0，以回應高齡化社會的長照問題。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-24587683-0016
哪些對象符合申請長照2.0 資格呢？
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this entity's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform