🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

Sentence-by-sentence verification

佳德牙醫診所 · Source page gztin.github.io/drous/case_teeth.html · c · 5 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
1
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)

DNT-6D2874AC7646
牙齒美白 牙齒美白 居家及門診速效美白 美白注意事項 牙齒美白案例 黃恬憶醫師 牙齒美白 成年人常因飲食習慣、抽煙或口內菌叢增生造成恆齒的齒色黯淡、偏黃或黑,影響美觀。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Tooth colour and whiteness: A review.Journal of dentistry · 2017 · PMID 28928097
Supported scope: 成年人對牙齒外觀的關注
DNT-2B9E5EA37180
牙齒美白是以過氧化物凝膠短暫接觸牙齒表面,使過氧化氫滲入牙本質小管將沉積在內的染色物質漂白,藉此達到修復齒色的效果。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙齒美白是以過氧化物凝膠短暫接觸牙齒表面,使過氧化氫滲入牙本質小管將沉積在內的染色物質漂白,藉此達到修復齒色的效果。
DNT-902D59276332
居家美白 將美白藥劑(較低濃度之過氧化物)塗布於量身訂製的牙托內,每天晚上睡眠時配戴在牙齒上。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 居家美白方法(低濃度過氧化物、牙托、夜間配戴)
DNT-D35ACCA57EF2
冷光為目前可知牙齒美白效果最佳的光源 (British Dental Journal 2008:204) 牙齒美白成效 以比色板 Vitapan Classic Shade Guide為標準減少2到7個色階(yourdentistryguide.com 2010) *居家美白依各人配戴習慣及用藥濃度時間不同,效果會有較大差異 牙齒美白的限制 四環黴素染色造成深淺不一的色帶補綴物-美白藥劑在自然齒及補綴物上作用效果不一致,若治療齒面曾經填補過,需在美白治療後重新填補。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-F55554154C9F
牙髓壞死導致的齒色變黑 -需搭配齒內美白治療 牙齒美白治療前 應接受牙醫師檢查評估,若有以下情況: 1.懷孕 2.授乳中 3.16歲以下 4.對過氧化氫過敏 5.未經治療控制的牙周病 6.敏感性牙齒 --不適合接受牙齒美白治療 牙齒美白後 可能帶來的不適 -牙齒敏感 -牙周組織(牙齦)的剌激感。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。

🗂 Related analyses (4)

c · gztin.github.io/drous/case_OrthognathicSurgery.htmlSentence analysis (1) →
c · gztin.github.io/drous/case_impactdeTeeth.htmlSentence analysis (6) →
c · gztin.github.io/drous/case_rebuild.htmlSentence analysis (26) →
c · gztin.github.io/drousSentence analysis (1) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisSite-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform