🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
#16 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-4DA4F768472E
• 半年洗牙能定期清除這些堆積物， 避免牙周病悄悄惡化。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 牙齒清潔被列為已證實且科學上成立的牙周病預防方法。
DNT-7218BFB6F460
4. 降低重大治療與高額費用的風險 • 小蛀牙只需補牙，但拖到牙神經壞死， 就可能需要根管治療或植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 小蛀牙僅需補牙、拖延至牙神經壞死後需根管治療或植牙的因果路徑未被 evidence 直接陳述；evidence 僅報告植牙旁鄰牙的蛀牙發生率及部分接受根管治療。
DNT-211958E29107
• 半年一次的洗牙與檢查， 比一次大手術便宜又輕鬆。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim比較半年一次洗牙檢查與大手術之價格與輕鬆程度，evidence為SRP對根管治療牙齒牙周囊袋之臨床效果RCT，未提及費用、手術比較或輕鬆程度。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform