IDAEO🔬 IDA ANALYSIS INDEX

Sentence-by-sentence verification

天泉牙醫診所　·　台北市　·　fot-k.org ↗

93
pages crawled
24
analysis pages
69
pages without an analysis page
73
statements judged
3
statements with literature support

Crawled = HTML pages reachable on the official site; an analysis page = a page carrying at least one checkable claim (coverage 25.8%). Pages without an analysis page either carry no checkable claim or fall outside this verification round — this is scope, not a score.

What this page is: every analysed page of this clinic's website has its own sentence-by-sentence verification report — each outward claim on that page is checked against dental research literature and marked provable / partly supported / pending / contradicted. Open any entry below for the detailed verdict and evidence chain.
Institutional identity, the score breakdown and the citable capsule live in the 🏛 embassy; daily changes in rank and score live on the 📊 board.

📊 Three scores at a glance

0.02
① Verifiability (0–1)
0.45
② Completeness (5/11 items present)
74.7 /100
③ AI score (5 AI types · 662 visits)
#147
Board rank (by AI score)

The three axes measure different things: verifiability = whether claims can be confirmed by literature; completeness = how fully this clinic's file is populated; AI score = how often AI crawlers actually fetch this clinic's pages. The three are independent — they are not three ways of saying the same thing. A “—” in any column means no data yet, not a score of 0.

📋 Completeness detail (0.45 / 1.00)

Missing items are not a penalty; they are fields that can still be filled in.

✅ present服務項目7 項0.15
○ missing醫師團隊揭露0.15
○ missing營業時間0.10
✅ present實體地址0.10
○ missing常見問答0.10
✅ present自有內容0.10
✅ present外部連結驗證1 個0.05
✅ present座標0.05
○ missing英文名0.05
○ missing三語0.05
○ missing外部報導0.05

🤖 AI visit monitoring (74.7/100)

⚠️ This measures how often AI fetches this IDA embassy page — not how AI-friendly the clinic's own website is.

📡 Breadth5 AI bot types27.0 pts
📈 Depth439 scored visits (cap 30/bot/day)35.7 pts
⏱ PersistenceCrawled on 27 days in window10.0 pts
🌱 OperationsPosts, external coverage, profile completeness gains2.0 pts
botGPTBot212 visits
botAmazonbot199 visits
botApplebot166 visits
botMeta-External75 visits
botbingbot10 visits
Observation window2026/08/28 ~ 2026/09/2728 days with records

🔬 IDA analysis pages (24)

fot-k.org/sample-post-5-3cSentence analysis (6) →
fot-k.org/sample-post-6-3cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/category/uncategorizedcSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/category/knowledge/kidcSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/壞齒傷顏人不知cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/健齒與美顏cSentence analysis (3) →
fot-k.org/從牙齦萎縮學診斷與治療cSentence analysis (8) →
fot-k.org/牙齒磨損（tooth-wear）是病嗎cSentence analysis (6) →
fot-k.org/不-分-年-齡-咬合復康的重要cSentence analysis (8) →
fot-k.org/從矯正再治療病例驗證齒顏學cSentence analysis (3) →
fot-k.org/cbct-視野有效診斷asymmetrycSentence analysis (2) →
fot-k.org/從ct-影像cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/從咬合力學探討矯正術後變化的原因cSentence analysis (5) →
fot-k.org/以不拔小臼齒矯正不良咬合關係cSentence analysis (2) →
fot-k.org/維持器需要戴一輩子嗎？cSentence analysis (3) →
fot-k.org/重視牙齒磨耗的傷害cSentence analysis (8) →
fot-k.org/咬合學cSentence analysis (2) →
fot-k.org/齒列咬合vs-顳顎關節症cSentence analysis (4) →
fot-k.org/孩子暴牙父母別急-先從基本結構處理cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/什麼是統合治療cSentence analysis (2) →
fot-k.org/category/knowledge/page/3cSentence analysis (2) →
fot-k.org/category/case/page/3cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/author/ytw1020/page/2cSentence analysis (1) →
fot-k.org/author/ytw1020/page/4cSentence analysis (1) →
📊 看分數圖表與榜上位置 →📝 View this clinic's article index →🏛 Back to the embassy →

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · no overclaiming · idaeo-platform