🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
小兵立大功 牙線的不可思議 刷牙、牙線、牙間刷 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-2A404F541BC3
小兵立大功 牙線的不可思議 刷牙、牙線、牙間刷、洗牙一直都稱為「護牙四寶」，但一般民眾都只習慣刷牙與洗牙，很少能夠真正的養成使用牙線的習慣，這也是為什麼每天刷牙還是一口爛牙的原因，豐華牙醫李宗翰醫師說。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 護牙四寶、牙線使用習慣、每天刷牙仍一口爛牙的原因、豐華牙醫李宗翰醫師說法等，均未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-0097729F5B21
中華民國臨床植牙醫學專科醫師李宗翰強調，現在市面上販售的牙線有兩種款式：一種為牙線棒、一種是整捆的牙線，前者的牙線較短，民眾在使用時雖然較為方便，但清潔效果不如後者; 整捆的牙線不僅可以拉出適當的長度，亦可徹底清潔口中的任何一個角落，將牙菌斑一網打盡。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「李宗翰醫師強調、牙線棒與整捆牙線比較、清潔效果差異」等全部陳述皆未見於 evidence。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform