🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
71 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-C7B1360609F8
EXE薏安牙醫診所獲《紐約市日報》高度讚譽 媒體報導 首頁 / 關於我們 / 媒體報導 吃硬不吃軟「超音波骨刀」，接近零風險的植牙關鍵 發布日期 : 2018-01-10 植牙技術已普遍應用於缺牙治療，往昔難以用肉眼判斷的諸多植牙前置作業，如骨質評估、齒槽骨生長情形、血管神經位置等，在「薏安牙醫」都可透過3D導航攝影技術立即顯影。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-28B68881C6D8
超音波骨刀與傳統工具的比較 ◆ 超音波骨刀 ◆ 傳統工具 不傷害軟組織，避免血管、黏膜等組織破裂 易穿破血管、黏膜等軟組織 刀頭體積小，精準切割骨頭 刀頭體積大，經常磨掉過多骨頭 前牙植牙不傷前側骨板，可現拔現種，無需二次手術 恐傷頰側骨板，需3-6個月補骨等待期，並需接受二次手術 < 返回列表 關於ＥＸＥ薏安牙醫診所_植牙醫療 ‧ 口腔護理 我們透過堅持每個細節，來體現醫療服務的價值;也希望透過卓然的態度及專業完善的診療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句未被支持：超音波骨刀與傳統工具的比較、軟組織傷害差異、前牙植牙可現拔現種、需3-6個月補骨等待期及二次手術等，均未見於證據。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform