🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

新竹日光翡麗牙醫雖然不比您的保險專員專業 — sentence-by-sentence verification

日光翡麗牙醫診所 · Source page www.drma.tw/category/dental-implant/page/13 ↗ · c · 8 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
3
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)

DNT-310B65BF3111
新竹日光翡麗牙醫雖然不比您的保險專員專業,但願意與您一起了解植牙有關的健保與保險問題。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 新竹日光翡麗牙醫的服務承諾、與保險專員比較、健保與保險問題諮詢等全部主張均未被 evidence 提及
DNT-96A5C2930927
... 了解門牙植牙風險與費用,讓你燦笑如花,美麗自然!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 門牙植牙的風險與費用,以及『燦笑如花、美麗自然』的美觀宣稱
DNT-589B9BA23C20
11 月 24, 2020 日光翡麗 » 新竹植牙 » 了解門牙植牙風險與費用,讓你燦笑如花,美麗自然!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-0A7EE13DA162
新竹植牙推薦日光翡麗牙醫院長馬瑞宏醫師表示,門牙植牙相較於一般植牙,特別注重前牙美學,要讓門牙植牙達到如真牙般自然溫潤又不讓你冒著風險,當然不能只靠醫師和您的運氣。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
[Related factors and countermeasures of dental implant aesthetics].Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology · 2020 · PMID 33171553
Supported scope: evidence直接斷言口腔植牙治療以穩定美學效果為目標,且提及影響美學成功的因素(如植體頸部設計、個別化支柱、組織再生與牙齦乳突高度),可支持「門牙植牙注重前牙美學」之一般性背景命題。
DNT-8D6716CC8CDA
日光翡麗診所專業植牙醫師,經驗豐富手法細膩,讓您植牙後可以盡情開懷大笑。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-78D4FC1AA7C9
Q2/哪些因素可能會導致微創植牙失敗?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 為提問「哪些因素可能導致微創植牙失敗」,evidence 雖提及植牙失敗率,但未針對「微創」或列舉失敗因素。
DNT-14F2FDF61A26
植牙手術發展至今已有數十年歷史,隨著醫學研究不斷進步,目前植牙成功率已達95%以上,然而臨床上仍不乏植牙失敗症狀。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival rates.Clinical oral investigations · 2024 · PMID 39305362
Supported scope: evidence 提供 20 年植牙存活率數據(92%、78%、88%),與 claim 中「成功率達95%以上」之數字相近但未達 95%。
DNT-C7F362BD749E
避免植牙失敗的關鍵因素 Q1 / 容易造成植牙失敗原因有哪些?
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Risk Factors for Early Dental Implant Failure.The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants · 2024 · PMID 38416010
Supported scope: 吸菸、男性、年輕患者為早期植牙失敗的風險因素

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · www.drma.tw/category/植牙/page/13Sentence analysis (1) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/14Sentence analysis (9) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/13Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/植牙/page/14Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.drma.tw/news/25Sentence analysis (5) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/dental-implant/page/14Sentence analysis (3) →
c · www.drma.tw/news/24Sentence analysis (6) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/15Sentence analysis (3) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform