🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
2. 牙冠斷裂 斷裂範圍較大 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-3826B428000D
2. 牙冠斷裂 斷裂範圍較大，侵犯到內部的象牙質，咬合或喝冷熱水有不舒服的感覺。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句均未被支持：evidence 僅比較牙冠製作技術的形態精度，未提及牙冠斷裂、象牙質侵犯或冷熱水/咬合不適。
DNT-E9052B1B0A53
若有傷到牙神經，會先進行根管治療再用假牙重建。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 根管治療期間及完成後需要有效的冠部密封（後續修復）
DNT-EB75AC2DDDBC
若可以保留可利用假牙重建，若不能保留得必須拔除，後續以植牙或牙橋方式重建。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 缺牙後可使用可摘局部假牙、牙橋等傳統重建方式，且有充分證據認為固定植牙支持式贗復體是單顆或多顆缺牙的可靠治療選項。
DNT-62D6FEE3D93C
3. 根管治療後的牙齒，建議裝上假牙保護，避免日後崩裂。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句『根管治療後的牙齒建議裝假牙保護以避免崩裂』的建議未被證據支持。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform