🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-850568A93C8C
因時間久了牙橋下方緣邊不密合及有慢性蛀牙,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋下方邊緣不密合、時間久了造成慢性蛀牙的因果情境未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-096BACC4C148
主要治療方式: 將她原本的牙橋假牙拆下,拆下後看見其虎牙蛀牙太嚴重無法保留,而進行拔牙。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 文獻直接陳述下顎第一臼齒常因蛀牙與牙周病而被拔除。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform