🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-A36E85B54F34
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-陶瓷嵌體(大範圍缺損) / 成功案例 / 陶瓷嵌體案例 同時製作兩種形式的補綴物 牙況： 兩顆大臼齒皆為根管治療後的... Continue Reading 傳統式假牙V.S 新式黏著式假牙案例 嚴重齒質缺損修復案例02 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-C887695DF9AF
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-陶瓷嵌體(大範圍缺損) / 成功案例 / 陶瓷嵌體案例 此為根管治療後，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-026F0A4291BF
牙況： 患... Continue Reading 覆蓋式及局部式陶瓷嵌體修補案例 全口活動假牙案例01 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月, 2022 Post category: 全口重建案例 / 張庭豪醫師案例-活動假牙 / 成功案例 / 活動假牙案例 患者： 陳婆婆，90歲高齡。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-5D99A8C09343
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 前牙四顆門牙重建 牙況： 患者的門牙區有根管治療合併大範圍樹... Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠及陶瓷貼片案例10 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例8(單顆)09 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-32C5000529E9
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例8(單顆)09 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例7(單顆)08 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6DA4647F4825
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例7(單顆)08 1 2 Go to the next page 近期文章 新竹植牙｜光明牙醫祝您2026父親節快樂!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform