🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-F851C004CF55
假牙牙套： 當蛀牙蛀的太嚴重，已經傷及牙神經時，醫師建議做完根管治療後，需要做假牙牙套將無神經的牙齒做個妥善的保護，這時除了將整顆牙齒四周完全修磨之外，咬合面也需要做些許的調整，最後再將金屬燒瓷或全瓷冠的假牙裝戴上去。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-9A0D03E84A0D
由於沒有傷及牙神經，不需要做根管治療，在牙齒還有神經的保護下，可以使用部分假牙，也是我們所說的3D齒雕。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 未傷及牙神經即可免根管治療、使用部分假牙（3D齒雕）及其適用條件，evidence完全未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform