🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-8DBBF6A17843
閱讀更多 » 【植牙風險評估】植牙的風險有哪些？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙風險項目與風險評估內容
DNT-4F05DD1CC583
閱讀更多 » 【一日植牙】即拔即種真的可以快速植牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 即拔即種／快速植牙的可行性與時間效益
DNT-AADFE4A43AD0
植牙優點數不清，但有多數民眾認為植牙整體療程時間太長，少則三至六個月多則一年以上，患者口腔條件狀況不一植牙手術時間也有所不同，有沒有什麼方法能達成一日植牙，甚至是即拔即種的治療方式，能更迅速且有效地為患者省去一年半載的治療時間，達成快速植牙的成果。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙優點眾多、多數民眾認為療程時間長（三至六個月/一年以上）、一日植牙或即拔即種可快速省時的宣稱。
DNT-8F00BA68BB1B
閱讀更多 » 醫師淺談植牙步驟，另外告訴您牙周病植牙風險在哪邊？
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 有牙周病病史者接受粗糙表面植體時，存活率會下降（即使有支持性牙周治療）。
DNT-6EF6810B479F
許多民眾認為人工植牙為金屬材質不會引起蛀牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『許多民眾認為』、『人工植牙為金屬材質』、『不會引起蛀牙』均未被 evidence 提及或證實。
DNT-B6928B02C543
恐造成植牙牙齦腫、植牙疼痛及植牙後牙齦發炎等症狀，
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據直接陳述植牙周圍軟組織發炎曾被報導，並在臨床症狀中列入 discomfort/pain、swelling、redness、pus，支持植牙周圍可能出現發炎、疼痛與腫脹之背景子命題。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform