🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-0DF7C001707B
對咬牙齒增長 : 容易造成咬合干擾及顳頷關節病變 長期單側咀嚼 : 容易造成單側肌肉肥大臉型不對稱 缺牙治療方式-活動假牙、牙橋、植牙簡述 恢復咬合功能 牙橋： 活動假牙： 植牙： 活動假牙、牙橋、植牙優缺點比較 恢復咬合功能 牙橋： 優點： 固定義齒，
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 缺牙者可考慮以活動假牙或植牙等治療方式替換缺牙
DNT-BC1013344F73
不需拿上拿下、咬合力可以接受、初期花費較植牙低 缺點： 需修掉好的牙齒 、有使用年限、清潔不易，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 不需拿上拿下、咬合力、初期花費低於植牙、修磨好牙、使用年限、清潔不易等比較與缺點皆無對應證據
DNT-3DDBB001EBA6
影響外觀 活動假牙： 優點： 較快、費用較低 缺點： 強度不足，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 活動假牙影響外觀、優點（較快、費用較低）、缺點（強度不足）等全部主張
DNT-2B71F81481C6
影響外觀 植牙： 優點： 不需破壞鄰牙、咬合力與正常牙相若、避免骨流失，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙不需破壞鄰牙、咬合力與正常牙相若、避免骨流失等優點宣稱。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform