🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-A9298FE44BEA
您有多元選擇 3 3 月, 2020 3:19 下午 國人嘴裡有一兩顆缺牙的不在少數，多半都是因為牙周疾病和蛀牙造成這不可逆的永久傷害，即便換上幾可亂真的假牙或植牙，仍無法與健康自然牙齒有神經牽連、富彈性調整的開咬功能相比。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-D017F79FAF18
談到缺牙重建治療，在新竹植牙有多年經驗的黃騰毅醫師根據患者缺牙數量、位置、經濟條件等情況為患者擬定最合適的治療方案，有多顆缺牙及全口重建患者可選擇假牙搭配植牙方式滿足需求。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence直接支持缺牙患者可考慮假牙、植牙，或兩者合併使用的一般性選項。
DNT-5E4444B4C84B
植牙與假牙最大的不同在於便利、擬真、堅固，尤其咀嚼功能可以最接近真牙的效果，優於牙橋的鄰接牙齒需要負荷缺牙的咬力去咀嚼堅硬食物的缺點；但是以費用為考量的話製作植牙所需的預算會高些，經濟條件若許可的話建議做人工植牙更符合現代人的生活方式。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙與假牙的便利/擬真/堅固比較、咀嚼功能接近真牙並優於牙橋、費用較高、經濟許可時建議植牙等，均未被 evidence 提及或證實。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform