🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
#125 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-1E42E24C335B
2021 / 06 / 03 全口重建根據選擇的療程不同，花費也不一樣，花費最高的是全口植牙，再來是All on 4然後是全口活動假牙，另外，醫生的經驗、植體及假牙材質的選用也會影響手術費用，如果術後恢復狀況不佳或是照顧不當，導致需要二次手術、療程，也會使費用增加。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform