🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

Sentence-by-sentence verification

典雅牙醫診所 · Source page dentart.tw/?p=3596 · c · 13 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
1
Partly supported
12
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (13 statements)

DNT-349E7CE503C6
17 2 月, 2023 10:00 上午 牙冠增長術費用ptt 引起討論,可以得知費用是民眾最感到好奇的部分。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6A53568DBB3E
從中可以得知 牙冠增長術費用 為: 牙冠增長術 (前牙):每顆牙8千元-1.2萬元 牙冠增長術 (後牙) :每顆牙1.2萬-2萬元 備註 費用含局部麻醉、基本手術器械及基本耗材 (如刀片、 紗布、縫針、縫線、生理食鹽水…等) 費用不含特殊自費項目 (如:手術導板、X 光分析、超 音波骨刀、雷射等…)。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-D6AA56D034BD
) 牙冠增長術作用除了改善牙齦與牙齒之間美觀比例狀況,其實也有其他狀況需要牙冠增長術的一臂之力。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長術可改善牙齦與牙齒美觀比例、以及尚有哪些其他狀況需要牙冠增長術,全文未提及。
DNT-D5718C3E9611
常見牙冠增長術情況: 嚴重蛀牙: 透過手術露出蝕洞,讓醫師更好進行清除及填補。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 嚴重蛀牙透過牙冠增長術手術露出蝕洞以利清除填補的適應症敘述,證據未提及
DNT-7CE2F292BF5F
牙冠過短無法配戴牙冠套: 因外力撞擊、蛀牙導致牙冠過短無法配戴好牙冠套,就會進行手術,避免牙冠套容易脫落的情形。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個 claim:因外力撞擊或蛀牙導致牙冠過短,無法戴牙冠套而需手術以避免脫落。
DNT-D0D8408EE32A
水雷射讓恢復加速 牙冠增長術會利用手術刀切開牙齦,儘管手術過程會上好足夠麻醉,但仍讓人擔心術後的腫痛狀況。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 水雷射加速恢復、牙冠增長術、手術刀切開牙齦、麻醉及術後腫痛擔憂均未被 evidence 直接支持。
DNT-A69B99D31285
實際上, 牙冠增長術恢復期 要多久?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長術恢復期所需的時間
DNT-F4BA15909D7E
由於傳統牙冠增長術運用手術刀切割牙齦,傷口較大緣故,出血量較大,也需較久的恢復期,民眾得捱受至少7天至10天的時間拆線以外,另外還得等待1-3個月復原。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-460CD276D9C1
由於復原期較久的緣故,難免對日常工作、飲食、清潔等方面造成不便,因此牙科技術後續也將「水雷射」技術應用在 牙冠增長術 ,使其替代手術刀,做到清準切割、少量出血、傷口小的治療成效,因此不需過長的恢復期。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 水雷射應用於牙冠增長術、替代手術刀、精準切割、少量出血、傷口小、不需較長恢復期,以及對日常工作飲食清潔的影響
DNT-903F7D270D12
水雷射牙冠增長術優點: 疼痛度降低:水雷射結合雷射與水分子,藉此降低雷射的熱能,不會產生熱傷害,使民眾享有舒適的手術過程。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 水雷射牙冠增長術結合水分子、降低熱能、不產生熱傷害、疼痛降低及舒適手術過程等具體宣稱,evidence 完全未提及。
DNT-9D12F5689026
精準切割:水雷射擁有雷射光的特性,能在牙齦上進行細微切割。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
A review of laser applications in orthodontics.International journal of orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.) · 2014 · PMID 24812743
Supported scope: evidence 直接斷言軟組織雷射可用於牙齦切除等手術且改善精準度,支持「雷射可在牙齦進行精準切割」的類別性部分。
DNT-6E1263AE6ED3
牙冠增長術能做什麼 牙冠增長術,是 一種牙周、牙齦的整形手術,把隱藏在牙齦下的牙齒暴露出來,增加牙冠的長度,恢復牙齒應有的美觀 ,又或者把斷裂、蛀蝕的牙齒透過牙冠增長術露出牙齦之外,以利牙醫師填補蛀洞或者安裝假牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長術作為牙周/牙齦整形手術、增加牙冠長度、露出斷裂或蛀蝕牙齒以利填補或裝假牙等主張,均未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-F14743E2273D
在手術治療之前,典雅的醫師必定經歷詳盡的檢查,為民眾拍攝X光,了解牙齒與齒槽骨的關係,評估是否合適進行「牙冠增長術」再著手進行。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 典雅診所醫師術前檢查流程、拍攝X光、評估牙冠增長術之機構特定宣稱

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · dentart.tw/?p=3592Sentence analysis (8) →
c · dentart.tw/?p=3602Sentence analysis (14) →
c · dentart.tw/2023/02/10Sentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/?p=3588Sentence analysis (3) →
c · dentart.tw/2023/02/13Sentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/2023/03/13Sentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/2023/10/10Sentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/2023/04/19Sentence analysis (1) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform