🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
news_detail02.php — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-D0B8ADFF1BDB
∣衛教文章 --> --> --> 越上面越好) --> --> 關於我們 about 關於我們 空間環境 影音專區 診療項目 services 全口重建 數位植牙 牙齒冷光美白 根管治療 假牙贋復 診療項目列表 門診時間 contact 門診時間(新竹舒芙美) 門診時間(苗栗擎天) 門診時間(新竹佩德) 特約診所 locations 聯絡我們 contact 衛教文章 contact 衛教文章 案例分享 醫師團隊 team 吃甜食蛀牙,但最傷牙的不是糖,而是牙齒酸蝕!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 甜食與牙齒酸蝕之比較
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform