🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
前牙錯咬(隱適美拔牙矯正) 【治療方式】 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-6249C6CCBE58
] 案例分享-20 上下顎暴牙(隱適美無拔牙矯正) (治療前後側面照) 使用隱適美改善上顎下顎嘴唇凸出，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-B4D0666D6B40
齒列有縫 隱適美矯正) 【治療方式】：無拔牙矯正配合骨釘 【治療時間】：兩年半個月 案例分享-18 厚道，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-738B6B092EF9
前牙錯咬(隱適美拔牙矯正) 【治療方式】：拔牙矯正(下門牙＆左上小臼齒) 【治療時間】：兩年一個月 案例分享-17 暴牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-94A1329F1828
齒列有縫 【治療方式】：拔牙治療 【治療時間】：三年 案例分享-16 上下顎暴牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-A328F115DB64
整齊暴牙 【治療方式】：拔牙治療＋上顎兩顆骨釘 【治療時間】：一年十一個月 人工植牙案例3 –
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-74A8F725E225
常見即拔即種案例 【案例類型】：植牙 【治療方式】：常見即拔即種 案例分享-15 上顎齒列嚴重擁擠 深咬 【案例類型】：上顎齒列擁擠凌亂 深咬 【治療方式】：不拔牙治療＋上顎兩顆骨釘 【治療時間】：一年九個月 案例分享-14 戽斗及前牙錯咬 【案例類型】：戽斗＆前牙錯咬 【治療方式】：無拔牙治療+兩顆骨釘 【治療時間】：一年六個月 ←
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform