🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
衛福部：牙線效果較佳 牙菌斑是造成牙周病的主要元… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-283839374F35
衛福部：牙線效果較佳 牙菌斑是造成牙周病的主要元凶，會造成牙肉發炎，使齒槽骨大量流失，用牙刷只能清到牙齒表面，但齒... More 21 sep 根管治療抽神經還牙痛？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-9A889D4A886E
牙醫：根管治療前必... 「您的蛀牙蛀到神經嘍，得做根管治療了！
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 蛀牙進展到牙髓感染時需要根管治療
DNT-3824000203AC
」根管治療，也就是俗稱的「抽神經」，目的是移除根管（也... More --> 1 2 3 ... 93 --> 全部 勤美公告 醫界新聞
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform