🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
精選案例 2026-05-31 蛀牙連帶影響舊牙… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-4B6D97A0819D
精選案例 2026-05-31 蛀牙連帶影響舊牙套，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-B2730A885DC3
連帶影響到早期在其他診所製作的牙套，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整个claim：連帶影響到早期在其他診所製作的牙套
DNT-974548954CFA
盧醫師在評估後，針對該顆牙齒的條件與需求，規劃以陶瓷貼片方式進行修補與色澤調整，讓修復後的牙齒在形態、顏色與鄰牙的協調性上更一致，同時也會一併考量咬合與使用上的穩定度，避免只追求漂亮、卻忽略日常咀嚼與清潔的可行性。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 卢医师规划陶瓷贴片、咬合与清洁考量
DNT-317ED893F261
信任延續舊經驗 林先生之所以選擇回到巧益牙醫處理這次修補，也與過去的就診經驗有關——他以前曾在巧益做過植牙，整體感受滿意，因此當面臨需要再次處理牙齒修復時，便優先選擇熟悉且信任的團隊。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim关于林先生因过去在巧益牙医满意植牙而选择再次就诊的个人经历完全未被evidence覆盖
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform