🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

Sentence-by-sentence verification

朱育正牙醫診所 · Source page www.cdcdental.com.tw/smile · c · 6 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
0
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)

DNT-D27F7D46CF77
笑容設計 牙醫學的關連性 早期的牙科治療,由於只限於拔牙,所以大多數的假牙設計也局限於全口的活動假牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句:早期牙科治療限於拔牙、假牙設計局限於全口活動假牙
DNT-9D2CB108AD6A
而在活動假牙的排牙設計上,美學設計不外乎就延續了18世紀以來的Campers line 等等顱像學和比較解剖學的知識,對於在說話以及微笑時牙齒所呈現的動態,幾乎沒有人進一步研究。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6DDAAA00B194
一直到了1958年Frush和Frisher等人才提出了在排列全口假牙時必須考慮到患者說話以及微笑是動態的表情。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-CF1D0C60BAA8
這就是最早提到微笑曲線(smiling line)的紀錄,他是一種排牙的方法,能夠讓患者在裝置全口假牙之後,牙齒呈現一個向下凸出的曲線。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句:最早提到微笑曲線的紀錄、排牙方法、全口假牙後牙齒呈現向下凸出曲線
DNT-C9EE8A8C569E
圖:年輕的牙齒切端的連線呈現銳利的圓弧型,老人的牙齒則呈現較為平緩的曲線。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 描述年輕與老人牙齒切端連線的曲線形狀差異,但 evidence 未討論切端連線或曲線形狀
DNT-C3A8A93F0418
術後製作第三副臨時假牙(9),等待牙齦癒合後,使用全瓷冠復形(10),患者展現自信笑容(11)。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。

🗂 Related analyses (3)

c · www.cdcdental.com.tw/?p=4124Sentence analysis (5) →
c · www.cdcdental.com.tw/?p=4121Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.cdcdental.com.tw/symmetry_or_balanceSentence analysis (4) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform