🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
29 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-F3A2E8D71CDA
建志牙醫診所-案例分享 診所介紹 醫療團隊 診療項目 案例分享 影片分享 最新資訊 聯絡我們 ☰ X 診所介紹 醫療團隊 診療項目 案例分享 影片分享 最新資訊 聯絡我們 案例分享 案例分享 CASE 案例三 兒童全⼝治療 2024-05-02 此案例是一位害怕看牙的3歲小朋友，因為對磨牙齒的聲音感到恐懼，因此決定使用不打針、不鑽牙的豪氏牙套方式進行治療，過程相當順利且快速的將多顆蛀牙治療完成，同時在不鏽鋼牙套的修復下，小朋友也對看牙的恐懼感下降許多，後來都能順利在門診完成檢查。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform