🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
糖尿病與牙周病的關聯性目前最為明確 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
3
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-03B79319977B
糖尿病與牙周病的關聯性目前最為明確，這兩者呈現雙向影響：高血糖環境讓牙周組織更容易發炎形成牙周病，而牙周病的存在又會進一步干擾血糖控制，形成惡性循環。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 糖尿病增加牙周病风险
DNT-8323E165DF26
例如阿茲海默症患者的大腦組織中，竟然有偵測到牙周病菌的基因痕跡；而懷孕婦女若有嚴重牙周病，會因細菌與發炎介質進入血液，引發子宮收縮，增加早產或低出生體重嬰兒的風險。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 完整claim：阿茲海默症患者大腦有牙周病菌基因，及牙周病增加早產風險
DNT-78F6B84C2682
所以結果就是，牙周病與糖尿病惡性循環無人察覺，牙齒鬆動與心血管風險之間的關聯也被忽略。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 牙周病與糖尿病存在雙向關係
DNT-836D128A3D99
許多先進國家已逐漸強調醫牙整合，將牙醫納入糖尿病、心臟病或孕產期的跨科團隊——當心臟科醫師在治療高血壓時，也會同步檢視牙周狀況；當糖尿病中心收治新病人，第一步就安排牙齒檢查。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整个claim涉及医牙整合、多学科团队、心脏科检视牙周、糖尿病中心第一步检查等具体做法，均未被evidence提及
DNT-F06359AE1156
而對病人而言，最需要意識到的是：「你刷的不是牙，是你的壽命；而你定期洗牙清除的，不是牙結石，而是慢性病的種子。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句比喻性断言：刷的不是牙是寿命、洗牙清除的不是牙结石而是慢性病种子
DNT-6046FE035424
從心血管、糖尿病、呼吸道，到認知退化到妊娠風險，這些你以為與牙齒無關的疾病，其實都有對應的警訊。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據直接指出懷孕與糖尿病會增加口腔病理風險，呼應claim中關於糖尿病與妊娠風險與牙齒相關的部分。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform