🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
不會像之前活動假牙無法食用硬食或是容易搖晃導致牙… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-C6BB0A6706A7
不會像之前活動假牙無法食用硬食或是容易搖晃導致牙肉長期受傷，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 完整宣稱：活動假牙無法食用硬食、容易搖晃、牙肉長期受傷等缺點
DNT-FA1EEF26317B
即可以提高活動假牙穩定性並增強咀嚼功能。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence 支持『兩顆下顎植體可顯著改善無牙患者的口腔功能與生活品質』，此為可與活動假牙相關的口腔功能改善子命題。
DNT-611B30A401D0
牙齒動牙須拔除 配合扣環式人工植牙 植牙與活動假牙結合，活動假牙可以穩定咀嚼不會脫落。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 由植體或牙根支持/固位的活動覆蓋義齒，其贋復治療結果較可預測
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform