🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-11832FB625D5
在牙齒有較大的缺損時，應該用較耐磨的材料保護牙齒 為了不要出現一補再補，造成牙齒結構不佳、斷裂而必須拔牙的情形，應該在牙齒有較大的缺損時，用較耐磨的材料、較能保護牙齒結構的方式來處理，像是用嵌體(齒雕)和假牙來取代補牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 使用嵌體或假牙替代補牙來保護較大缺損牙齒的建議
DNT-D82AA6A00C3D
這樣才能最大地延長牙齒的壽命，保護我們的牙齒不用因為斷裂而拔牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-E97CAAFB98DD
補牙、齒雕、全瓷冠比較表 "> 健保補牙 齒雕 全瓷冠 比較圖 適用範圍 小範圍缺損 中等範圍缺損 大範圍缺損，能最大程度保護牙齒 耐用度 較低，易磨損 堅硬、耐磨， 近似於牙齒的琺瑯質 堅硬、耐磨，近似於牙齒的琺瑯質 美觀 容易變色 像天然牙 像天然牙 優點 健保補助 修磨量較少 有最高的保護力 案例: 左下臼齒表面嚴重缺損 病人有嚴重磨耗之臼齒，使用全瓷嵌體修復，既可保留牙齒結構，又兼具美觀與耐用性 傳統假牙和全瓷比較表 全瓷冠有三大特點:透光度高、邊緣美觀和良好的強度。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-03B8BFE655E9
案例2：全瓷冠與傳統假牙之比較 病人因長期牙齒磨損，上門牙選用全瓷假牙、下門牙選用傳統假牙修復。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠與傳統假牙在長期牙齒磨損案例中的比較
🗂 Related analyses (6)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform