🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-5ED8939D2136
醫師會依據蛀牙程度從輕至重而有不同的處理方式，小範圍樹脂補牙就可，範圍大則需要用齒雕（陶瓷嵌體）來補牙，若是範圍大到無法補牙，只能用根管治療補救。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 蛀牙進展至牙髓感染時需要根管治療。
DNT-4431ED11988F
鍾國耀醫師也補充表示抽過神經後的牙齒也可以使用陶瓷嵌體，醫師會依牙齒缺損範圍多寡來決定適用3D齒雕或是 全瓷冠 建立一個新的咬合面，來保護蛀牙受損的牙齒。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句：醫師姓名、抽神經後使用陶瓷嵌體、3D齒雕/全瓷冠選擇、建立咬合面保護蛀牙等臨床建議，evidence 均未涉及。
DNT-87C9A53CFFC7
有時患者使用顯微根管治療可能留下較多齒質較建議使用3D齒雕，既不必再多耗損健康琺瑯質，也可以重建咬合面。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 顯微根管治療保留較多齒質、建議3D齒雕、不耗損健康琺瑯質、重建咬合面
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform