🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-88225FAE4A37
舉例來說，若3D齒雕使用在牙齒裂痕縫隙，會採用嵌體型態，價格較低；而若是使用在大面積的牙冠缺損，則會使用另外一種覆蓋整個牙冠的「蓋冠體」型態，價格自然較高。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 3D齒雕使用於裂痕縫隙採嵌體價格較低、大面積牙冠缺損使用蓋冠體價格較高等，均未見於證據。
DNT-3225E8A662E2
因此3D齒雕必須在較小的區塊中，做到與全瓷冠般的保護效果，製作上更講求醫師的準確度與專業，藉助數位精密製程，誤差可 由於3D齒雕製作過程較複雜，所需時間長、技術門檻高，患者在挑選醫師時，可以確認醫師是否為專業合格的牙科醫師，並且參考醫師過往臨床經驗及名聲。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 3D齒雕需在小區塊達到全瓷冠保護效果、製作複雜耗時、技術門檻高、需藉數位製程控制誤差，以及患者應如何挑選醫師等命題。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform