🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)
DNT-76B4593B40FB
」 中永和全瓷冠推薦 －博誠美學牙醫表示，硬度與美感兼具的全瓷冠在正確的使用下可陪伴10、15年以上的咀嚼時光，然而在遇到種種情況仍有造成 全瓷冠裂開 的可能性。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-C04C0DDD5D93
到那時可不是修補那麼簡單而已，內部真牙可能再次面臨蛀牙，還得重新製作全新牙冠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 真牙再次蛀牙、重新製作牙冠的風險與時間點均未在證據中提及
DNT-15812E22934C
博誠美學牙醫表示， 全瓷冠裂開可是賠了夫人又折兵 ，民眾務必事前慎選醫師製作假牙，並在配戴後將其視為真牙般悉心對待。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句未獲支持：證據未討論全瓷冠裂開、慎選醫師或配戴後維護方式。
DNT-B3E4925A9DFE
然而， 全瓷冠裂開 有可能是當初在製作的時牙齒修型的量不夠，或者是患者的咬合力量過大過猛而導致。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠裂開可能源於牙齒修型量不足或咬合力量過大等全部宣稱均未獲支持。
DNT-B81A545A0767
儘管，全瓷冠相比真牙裂開的機率更低，但仍有可能在遇到同樣情況時使 全瓷冠裂開 。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 玻璃模擬全瓷冠在特定負載下會從邊緣出現裂紋起始。
DNT-430E037B567C
然而，不管是哪種情況，都需要重製新的全瓷冠提供內部真牙完整保護。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 無論何種情況都需重製全瓷冠以提供內部真牙完整保護的臨床結論。
DNT-874597E69B52
如果想說全瓷冠只有局部缺損而置之不理，就容易在飲食後卡食物殘渣與牙菌斑，細菌從全瓷冠裂開處侵入內部牙齒，真牙就會再次面臨二次蛀牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠局部缺損、飲食後卡食物殘渣與牙菌斑、細菌從裂開處侵入、真牙二次蛀牙的因果宣稱
DNT-6396B5AF2B83
全瓷冠裂開原因如是因為當初製作牙齒修磨齒質不足，又或者是全瓷冠硬度不夠導致。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 全瓷冠/雙層陶瓷修復體的瓷層可能因材料剛性與冠厚度等因素而發生磨耗、碎裂、剝離等失效
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform