🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
8
Partly supported
18
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (26 statements)
DNT-2BAAFC842F52
面對缺牙一定要植牙嗎的疑問，其實關鍵在於預防後續更龐大的骨頭流失與修復成本，永和博誠牙醫將解析 專業牙科觀點與重建方案 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-527A7FA8EF4C
3 種全口重建方案的優缺點分析 固定式牙橋的快速重建與其技術限制 活動式假牙的非侵入性與其配戴舒適度 人工植牙的力學獨立性與骨質保留價值 深度討論：能做假牙就不要植牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 三種全口重建方案（固定式牙橋、活動式假牙、人工植牙）的優缺點比較、快速重建、非侵入性、力學獨立性及「能做假牙就不要植牙」之討論，evidence均未探討。
DNT-BEBC3D23A75A
一旦骨頭萎縮過多，植牙的支撐力與穩定度將大打折扣。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句均未被直接支持；evidence 未直接陳述『骨頭萎縮過多』與『植牙支撐力、穩定度大打折扣』之間的因果或程度關係。
DNT-D7200AD8FEC2
牙橋雖能快速恢復外觀，但對鄰牙的負擔不可忽視。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 多顆相連/牙橋式贗復物應盡量以單顆牙冠取代的臨床建議。
DNT-50AC1503ADF2
活動式假牙的非侵入性與其配戴舒適度 活動假牙適合無法進行手術或有全身性疾病的患者。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『活動式假牙的非侵入性』、『配戴舒適度』及『適合無法手術或全身性疾病患者』均未被證據提及。
DNT-0CE2B6708A99
每日需拆卸清洗，咀嚼力與咬合穩定度遠低於人工植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『每日需拆卸清洗』與『咀嚼力及咬合穩定度遠低於人工植牙』完全未被證據提及或比較。
DNT-2CD18E70BAC8
對於追求舒適感的患者，活動假牙的侷限性較為明顯。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 完整 claim 均未被支持：對於追求舒適感的患者，活動假牙的侷限性較為明顯。
DNT-F16B7930BB0F
人工植牙的力學獨立性與骨質保留價值 植牙能獨立承受咬合力，不需犧牲鄰牙齒質。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 植體在增加咬合力/應力下仍有高存活率（原文直接斷言此點）。
DNT-68B89D336CD9
項目 人工植牙 固定牙橋 活動假牙 費用 高 中 低 耐用度 高 中 低 鄰牙傷害 無 高 無 深度討論：能做假牙就不要植牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 人工植牙/固定牙橋/活動假牙在費用、耐用度、鄰牙傷害的比較表，以及「能做假牙就不要植牙」的結論，均未在證據中出現。
DNT-551AF8C9838D
牙醫師教您 4 招評估最適合方案 面對能做假牙就不要植牙的說法，我們應以理性評估為主。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句未被支持：『4 招評估』、『能做假牙就不要植牙』之理性評估方法未出現於證據
DNT-C8BFF24D340E
若鄰牙本就有大面積填補，利用牙橋修復較為合理。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 完整 claim 未被支持：未討論鄰牙大面積填補時的治療選擇，也未比較牙橋與其他修復方式的合理性。
DNT-D9BC1A14110E
必須評估鄰牙是否健康，避免增加根管治療風險。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『必須評估鄰牙是否健康，避免增加根管治療風險』的整句宣稱，證據未提及鄰牙評估或根管治療風險。
DNT-46757D754227
齒槽骨條件與補骨手術的心理預算權衡 骨質條件是決定能否植牙的最關鍵硬體指標。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 骨質條件或骨量不足時，骨再生對植牙治療成功至關重要
DNT-8A83D9E4110D
若缺牙過久導致骨量不足，必須額外編列補骨費用。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 缺牙後骨吸收常造成骨量不足以植牙，因此發展出引導骨再生、上顎竇增高、齒槽嵴保存等補骨程序來促進新骨形成
DNT-46F50DD7983A
補骨手術雖能改善條件，但仍建議趁早規劃植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 補骨手術能改善條件的效果宣稱，以及趁早規劃植牙的臨床建議
DNT-64B31115FFD5
植牙初期費用較高，但照護得當可長期使用。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙初期費用較高、照護得當可長期使用。
DNT-200511DEF128
全身性疾病對手術安全性的門檻評估 部分慢性病患者需評估植牙手術的安全性風險。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全身性疾病、慢性病患者植牙手術安全性風險評估均未在 evidence 中討論；病例為健康無慢性病史患者。
DNT-9AB3815E5BAF
精準定位能讓植牙過程更為安心順暢。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 電腦輔助植牙技術能顯著提高植體置入的精準度（相較徒手方式）
DNT-9D43AFD602B5
舒眠植牙技術解決高度焦慮患者的看診門檻 針對手術焦慮嚴重的患者，我們提供專業舒眠選擇。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-9FA3BBFA76E0
舒眠技術是高度焦慮患者完成植牙的最佳選擇。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 舒眠技術是高度焦慮患者完成植牙的最佳選擇，證據未提及舒眠技術或最佳選擇。
DNT-5E36060F0EBF
植牙的成功率取決於醫師技術與術後清潔維護。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 植牙失敗原因為多因素。
DNT-130E9D2019F4
只要正確進行植體清潔，植牙周圍炎的風險極低。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 正確植體清潔與植牙周圍炎風險極低之間的因果或量化關係
DNT-428433D89E71
博誠美學提供完善的植牙後照護計畫與定期追蹤。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 未提及博誠美學機構本身、植牙後照護計畫或定期追蹤服務。
DNT-4262A5E06581
選擇專業醫療團隊，能確保植牙穩定度與長期成功率。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 未提及專業醫療團隊選擇、確保穩定度與長期成功率的因果保證。
DNT-23E32F679922
是否需要補骨取決於患者缺牙後的骨質流失程度。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 缺牙後的生理性骨吸收常導致骨量減少，因此有骨再生/補骨程序的需求。
DNT-9EA1B3718C2C
我們有多種補骨解決方案，能有效提升植牙的成功率。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據直接斷言：補骨組與未補骨組的植牙成功率與存活率無顯著差異，補骨並未有效提升植牙成功率。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform