🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
news.asp — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-1C9ED5FE8128
繼續往下滑囉 . . . . . 正解是:A. 等它自然掉落 雖然網路上的影片有各種有趣又快速的拔乳牙方式 在牙醫師的角度認為乳牙應該要讓它自然脫落才是最保險的 不適當地用力、用錯工具,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 乳牙應讓其自然脫落、不當用力或用錯工具可能造成風險、網路拔牙影片不安全等主張,evidence 均未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform