🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
news.asp — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-5E9DB8AEB3B7
兒童牙膏的成分中添加的甜味來源多屬於 #木糖醇 、 #山梨糖醇 、 #醣基海藻糖 等等 這些成分不僅不會導致蛀牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 兒童牙膏甜味來源為木糖醇、山梨糖醇、醣基海藻糖，以及這些成分不會導致蛀牙的宣稱，均未見於此摘要。
DNT-BF0A37C77CF6
挑選時選擇含有足夠 #氟化物 的牙膏即可 其他的口味和添加物基本上適量就沒有問題 使用牙膏時只要使用米粒大小、碗豆大小的量就好 選擇孩子能喜歡、並且可以幫助他養成定期使用習慣的牙膏就OK囉 «
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙膏氟化物濃度、口味與添加物安全性、米粒或豌豆大小用量、兒童喜好與養成習慣等均未獲支持。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform